?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Marilee J. Layman

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
09:13 pm: Unusual Assistance Animals and My Reflexive Racism
Let's take the last first -- I was reading an old WashPost last night and my eye caught on a concert by the Blind Boys of Alabama at DAR Constitution Hall. My reflexive thought was that the Daughters of the American Revolution must not have known the Blind Boys were also black men. And then I realized that the DAR admitted black women in 1984. When Marian Anderson's manager tried to book her in the Hall in 1939, she was not allowed (and sang standing on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial) and First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, plus thousands of others, quit the DAR. The DAR didn't officially change their whites-only policy for performers until 1952. So it was a long time, and even if I qualified, I wouldn't want to join, but they do allow not only black, but Hispanic and Native Americans, as long as their lineage meets the qualifications. Still, my mind thinks of them as racist, which is racist in itself.

This is the blog of a writer who has a very interesting NYT article (linked in the blog) about unusual assistance animals. Guide horses (miniature), a parrot that helps keep a guy from being psychotic, and a monkey that lets an agoraphobic woman go outside, for example. She has some additional video and pictures in the blog post that are as interesting as the NYT article.

Tags: ,

Comments

[User Picture]
From:guppiecat
Date:January 4th, 2009 03:56 am (UTC)
(Link)
It seems to me that any group that limits membership based on factors out of your control is part of the same overall group that contains racism and sexism. While they have a right to be who they are, I still think that I wouldn't want to associate with them.
[User Picture]
From:dd_b
Date:January 4th, 2009 04:01 am (UTC)
(Link)
This is a group that *used to* have clearly racist policies. It's often hard to prove or disprove the theory that they still have the basic attitude, and have just learned to cloak it to gain mainstream acceptance.
[User Picture]
From:guppiecat
Date:January 4th, 2009 04:08 am (UTC)
(Link)
Ah, but you cannot join DAR with out proof of "good lineage". Since my family did not come over on the Mayflower and isn't so established, I couldn't join even if I wanted to. That form of exclusion, to me, is just as bad as racism and sexism, for the same meta-reasons. It's just that they don't use a currently disapproved method to filter people out. Seems to me that the attitude is there and going strong, not even masked.
[User Picture]
From:mjlayman
Date:January 4th, 2009 04:07 am (UTC)
(Link)
Besides, my ancestor in the Revolutionary War was a Prussian mercenary working for the Brits! His descendants have often been American military men, but he was on the wrong side, and stayed. No, I just grew up and spent time as an adult acknowledging that they were racist and now, technically, they aren't.
[User Picture]
From:serge_lj
Date:January 4th, 2009 04:50 pm (UTC)
(Link)
My wife chose not to become a DAR, but she could have joined as she goes all the way back to George Washington himself, and to his cousin Benedict Arnold. A bit more than a decade before, Benny got wounded in the foot when he and others tried to invade my hometown.
Powered by LiveJournal.com